[members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Knell
david.knell at gmail.com
Thu Nov 21 19:06:59 CET 2013
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Don't try to speak for "most here". I, for one, have met Lu Heng in > person, > have seen him actively take part in the address policy discussions, and > do trust the RIPE NCC to very closely check whether such a big allocation > can be backed by numbers and documentation. So I most certainly do not > see "CLEARLY" that there would be a violation of RIPE policies - and > even if it's currently announced from elsewhere, that doesn't mean it's > not actually *used* in the RIPE service region (think "VPN services"), > which is the key issue - address space being *used*, and not siphoned > off elsewhere. Even though the latter point is a bit moot nowadays. > > Agreed. However: nmap -n -sn -PE -T4 37.222.0.0/15 Nmap done: 131072 IP addresses (406 hosts up) scanned in 210.43 seconds --Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20131121/b3fd644a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]