[members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
Sergey Razu serjrazu at gmail.com
Thu Dec 12 17:40:38 CET 2013
отключите меня из переписки 12 Dec 2013, в 19:24, rob.golding at astutium.com написал(а): >> Really, the RIPE membership fees should be based mostly on "the share >> of limited resources that your LIR uses", >> if a LIR has a /8 allocated >> that is 1/23th of the whole address space available from RIPE; thus >> should pay alone 1/23th of the budget of RIPE > > But that 1 entry in a database isn't 1/23rd of the cost of running the > behemoth that RIPE has become. > A *nominal* membership fee and a pay-per-db-object would be fairer. > > If your concern is over the amount you pay RIPE, then put up a proposal > to get rid of soem of the extraneous 'projects' and other spending, so > it gets back to just doing, only doing and exactly doing what it was > created for - managing a db of a list of resources. > > If your concern is over the amount of IP addresses you can get access to > - you're 10 years too late > Ipv4 has run out. Get over it. > > Rob > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.