[members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC

отключите меня из переписки


12 Dec 2013, в 19:24, rob.golding at astutium.com написал(а):

>> Really, the RIPE membership fees should be based mostly on "the share
>> of limited resources that your LIR uses",
>> if a LIR has a /8 allocated
>> that is 1/23th of the whole address space available from RIPE; thus
>> should pay alone 1/23th of the budget of RIPE
> 
> But that 1 entry in a database isn't 1/23rd of the cost of running the 
> behemoth that RIPE has become.
> A *nominal* membership fee and a pay-per-db-object would be fairer.
> 
> If your concern is over the amount you pay RIPE, then put up a proposal 
> to get rid of soem of the extraneous 'projects' and other spending, so 
> it gets back to just doing, only doing and exactly doing what it was 
> created for - managing a db of a list of resources.
> 
> If your concern is over the amount of IP addresses you can get access to 
> - you're 10 years too late
> Ipv4 has run out. Get over it.
> 
> Rob
> 
> ----
> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss
> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:
> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view
> 
> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.