[members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC

> Really, the RIPE membership fees should be based mostly on "the share
> of limited resources that your LIR uses",
> if a LIR has a /8 allocated
> that is 1/23th of the whole address space available from RIPE; thus
> should pay alone 1/23th of the budget of RIPE

But that 1 entry in a database isn't 1/23rd of the cost of running the 
behemoth that RIPE has become.
A *nominal* membership fee and a pay-per-db-object would be fairer.

If your concern is over the amount you pay RIPE, then put up a proposal 
to get rid of soem of the extraneous 'projects' and other spending, so 
it gets back to just doing, only doing and exactly doing what it was 
created for - managing a db of a list of resources.

If your concern is over the amount of IP addresses you can get access to 
- you're 10 years too late
Ipv4 has run out. Get over it.

Rob