[members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCCCharging Scheme Model
Andrea Cocito andrea.cocito at ifom.eu
Tue Jul 17 15:43:40 CEST 2012
On Jul 17, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Jørgen Hovland wrote: > Why should a large company with many employees and/or high revenue pay more than a small company if they both eat up the same amount of resources at RIPE NCC ? I really can't understand this "amount of resources" in term of "amount of work done by RIPE NCC". RIPE NCC needs to do a lot of work to screen, monitor and limit IPv4 resources usage because large players wasted these resources or a keeping them allocated. Otherwise please allocate to my LIR that last /8, that is going to take very little time and effort, just the time to ad one entry into the database and it's done: thus I don't expect that we have to pay more than who just asked for a /24, right? After all I am supporting optimization of work at RIPE.... with only one ticked the whole IPv4 handling and the address space exhaustion issue is solved :) A.