[members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Oct 12 19:52:28 CEST 2011
On 12/10/2011 18:48, Sascha Luck wrote: > Hi Jochem, > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:35:38PM +0200, Jochem de Ruig wrote: >> For example, if a /18 is requested and would put an LIR into a larger >> category, if we did not take the PI resource into account for the >> categorisation, requesting a /18 of PI space would be beneficial over a >> requesting a /18 of PA space. > Right, this makes kind of sense for PI space assigned to the requesting > LIR. What about space requested on behalf of end users - the LIR does > not benefit from the use of this space, in fact after 2007-01 it merely > handles the request on behalf of the end user and the NCC. > The LIR is free to charge the end user for this service, surely? Or am I confused? Nigel ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]