[members-discuss] [Ticket#2011100301002157] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
info at leadertelecom.ru
Mon Oct 3 20:44:15 CEST 2011
Dear Nigel, > We are looking at increased costs largely because we expect the "run out > fairly" and IPv4 depletion measures to result in much more work for > registration services. Could you tell what you mean when you tell about "much more work for registration services" ? > Full budget (and charging scheme > details) will be available well in time for the AGM. New charging scheme in not very good balanced. IP-address have very high value. AS - not. When end user need IP-addresses - most of time needs for understand how customer will use IP-addresses and ASN RIPE give automatic and as a result cost of assignment ASN is not the same as assigment IP-addreses. I think cost of ASN assignment should be 0 euro. As a result this resource should'n included on calculating size of LIR. I suggest to remove this column from charging scheme. -- Alexey S Ivanov General Director LeaderTelecom Ltd. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20111003/5da82f44/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]