[members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to"police order"?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to"police order"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jørgen Hovland
jorgen at ssc.net
Fri Nov 11 12:07:02 CET 2011
On 11/11/11 09:34, Axel Pawlik wrote: > Good morning Sascha, all, > > you are right Sascha, this is an order from the Dutch > police, on behalf of the Distract Attorney. > > If we were to refuse it, according to counsel, we > would become liable for consequences of that. > I'm expecting further information today as to > which further consequences a refusal would have. > If you don't mind, I have a question: First of all, did you receive any real reason why they requested this? If not, I find that decision disturbing. As opposed to other things in the RIPE NCC budget, the potential expenses for pursuing this is something I would gladly accept. When you permit things like that it is damaging the reputation. Cheers, J
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to"police order"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]