This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sven Olaf Kamphuis
sven at cb3rob.net
Fri Aug 5 15:30:06 CEST 2011
regarding the ipv4 address space, we've actually tried to announce some
e-class space over the past days, appearantly, most, if not all, routers
filter it.
works fine within our network, so its probably bgp related
either a filter people -actually deliberately installed- or
hardcoded into the software.. not sure on that.
(240.0.0.0/4 - reserved future/experimental use)
furthermore, we've found a bunch of legacy ranges, which are not
announced at all, so if the DoD and IBM would be kind enough to hand
them over to ARIN/IANA, that would be appreciated
don't see why "the prudential insurance company of america" would need an
/8, clearly they don't see the point of it themselves either, as they
don't announce a single ip out of it :P
for N in `cat free`;do echo $N.0.0.0/8;whois $N.0.0.0/8|grep -i name:;done
7.0.0.0/8
NetName: DISANET7
OrgName: DoD Network Information Center
OrgTechName: Network DoD
OrgTechName: Registration
9.0.0.0/8
NetName: IBM
OrgName: IBM Corporation
OrgAbuseName: IBM Corporation
21.0.0.0/8
NetName: DNIC-SNET-021
OrgName: DoD Network Information Center
OrgTechName: Network DoD
OrgTechName: Registration
22.0.0.0/8
NetName: DNIC-SNET-022
OrgName: DoD Network Information Center
OrgTechName: Network DoD
OrgTechName: Registration
25.0.0.0/8
NetName: RIPE-ERX-25
OrgName: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
OrgTechName: RIPE NCC Operations
netname: UK-MOD-19850128
org-name: DINSA, Ministry of Defence
26.0.0.0/8
NetName: DISANET26
OrgName: DoD Network Information Center
OrgTechName: Registration
OrgTechName: Network DoD
28.0.0.0/8
NetName: DNIC-NET-028
OrgName: DoD Network Information Center
OrgTechName: Registration
OrgTechName: Network DoD
29.0.0.0/8
NetName: MILX25-TEMP
OrgName: DoD Network Information Center
OrgTechName: Registration
OrgTechName: Network DoD
30.0.0.0/8
NetName: DNIC-NET-030
OrgName: DoD Network Information Center
OrgTechName: Registration
OrgTechName: Network DoD
37.0.0.0/8
NetName: RIPE-37
OrgName: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
OrgTechName: RIPE NCC Operations
netname: EU-ZZ-37
org-name: RIPE NCC
45.0.0.0/8
48.0.0.0/8
NetName: PRU48
OrgName: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
OrgTechName: Network Administrator
OrgAbuseName: Network Administrator
OrgNOCName: Network Administrator
51.0.0.0/8
NetName: RIPE-ERX-51
OrgName: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
OrgTechName: RIPE NCC Operations
netname: UK-DWP
org-name: UK Government Department for Work and Pensions
104.0.0.0/8
179.0.0.0/8
NetName: LACNIC-179
OrgName: Latin American and Caribbean IP address Regional Registry
OrgTechName: LACNIC Whois Info
--
Greetings,
Sven Olaf Kamphuis,
CB3ROB Ltd. & Co. KG
=========================================================================
Address: Koloniestrasse 34 VAT Tax ID: DE267268209
D-13359 Registration: HRA 42834 B
BERLIN Phone: +31/(0)87-8747479
Germany GSM: +49/(0)152-26410799
RIPE: CBSK1-RIPE e-Mail: sven at cb3rob.net
=========================================================================
<penpen> C3P0, der elektrische Westerwelle
http://www.facebook.com/cb3rob
=========================================================================
Confidential: Please be advised that the information contained in this
email message, including all attached documents or files, is privileged
and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or
individuals addressed. Any other use, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, James Blessing wrote:
> On 05/08/2011 14:08, Simon Talbot wrote:
>> Have I missed something quite fundimental, but why can't we just keep the
>> current charging model, it seems to work reasonably well and change for
>> change's sake is never a good idea. Also with the level of automation that
>> currently exists, and the good working knowledge that most people have of
>> the systems, we could probably considerably reduced the RIPE's staffing
>> levels and save a great deal of money. In times of belt tightening, even
>> "Not for Profit" organisations like the RIPE must make the same cut backs
>> as those that exist to make a profit.
>
> I gather the change is not to increase revenue but rather to change the
> distribution to make it 'fair' and 'easier to understand'. Getting a
> consensus on what that means appears to have 'winners' on one side and
> 'losers' on the other.
>
> J
> --
> James Blessing
> +44 7989 039 476
> Strategic Relations Manager, EMEA
> Limelight Networks
>
> ----
> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss
> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general
> page:
> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view
>
> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here,
> you can add or remove addresses.
>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]