[ncc-services-wg] Re: [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Wed Aug 3 15:31:46 CEST 2011
* Christian Wittenhorst: > Of course, they do ;-) IPv4 address space is a scarce and valuable > resource now. And a /12 user occupies a lot more that limited resource > than a /20 user does. > > If someone justifies a /12, Internet is obviously a major part of his > business (or he's incredibly huge). And more importantly, he uses a > major part of the limited resource. A "fee" of EUR 0.002 per IP is > more than reasonable. I don't think RIPE NCC is in a position to establish an address space tax. Existing fees are there to cover administrative costs and other RIPE activities, not as an incentive for address space conservation. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]