This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dariusz Margas
dariusz.margas at netregistry.com.au
Fri Jun 19 00:15:31 CEST 2009
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Hank Nussbacher wrote: >> All Assignments made since 1992 will be included. > > I have stated it before and I'll state it again - changing the billing rules > retroactively is wrong. Maybe even EU legally wrong. Allocations made in > the 1990s should not be billed. By all means recover unannounced allocations > by whatever means necessary, but charging LIRs for allocations made in 1995 > is wrong. Well, as someone said, this is from now onwards only. Yet this is the goal - to charge for everything, for these in use and for these kept "just in case". Money can trigger some changes in peoples' minds and switch them from "grab as much as you can" mode into new one, which can be "keep as little as you really need and try to conserve as much as possible" I reckon it is too cheap. I can not imagine any running business, in fact large scale business which needs PI and can not afford 50 EU per year! This is not 50 grant, is it? Regards Dariusz Margas
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]