AW: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010

Sorry,

but maybe you shouldn't put daily-use business email addresses into mailing-lists?

Someone has to have that configured at any point in time. Ever took a look into the LIR portal? Just unsubscribe there (under 'General')...

Btw, replying to all including a mailing list like the one you're complaining about is better behaviour?



Marcus


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engineering IP Services

Versatel West GmbH

Unterste-Wilms-Strasse 29
D-44143 Dortmund

Fon: +49-(0)231-399-4486 | Fax: +49-(0)231-399-4491
marcus.gerdon at versatel.de | www.versatel.de

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Dortmund | Registergericht: Dortmund HRB 21738
Geschäftsführer: Marc Lützenkirchen, Dr. Hai Cheng, Dr. Max Padberg, Peter Schindler
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 AS8881 / AS8638 / AS13270 | MG3031-RIPE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: members-discuss-admin at ripe.net
> [mailto:members-discuss-admin at ripe.net] Im Auftrag von Adapt
> Service Desk
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2009 14:22
> An: s.sulava at unistream.com; Hostmaster; Natalya Petrova;
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> Betreff: RE: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
>
> Ripe,
>
> Please remove us from this discussion thread. It is totally
> irrelevant to us and is filling our mailbox with junk.
>
> You may have the following e-mail addresses on record,
>
> servicedesk at adaptplc.com
> support at mnet.co.uk
> hostmaster at adaptplc.com
> hostmaster at mnet.co.uk
>
> please remove them all.
>
>
> Regards,
> Raj Bola
> Service Desk Manager
>
> adapt
> New Broad Street House, 35 New Broad Street, London  EC2M 1NH
> t: +44 (0)845 304 3046
> e: servicedesk at adaptplc.com  
>
> www.adaptplc.com
>
> adapt, the independent managed services provider offering the
> broadest choice of next generation technologies, and doing
> right by our customers.
>
> adapt to success!  We're ranked 15th in the 2008 Tech Track 100.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: members-discuss-admin at ripe.net
> [mailto:members-discuss-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of ?????? ??????
> Sent: 18 June 2009 12:56
> To: Hostmaster; Natalya Petrova; members-discuss at ripe.net
> Subject: RE: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
>
> Hi All!
>
> There's no such  document in RIPE database.
> But I suppose Natalya is speaking about this:
>
> "[Apologies for duplicate emails]
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> The RIPE NCC is currently formulating the Draft Charging Scheme 2010.
> The Draft Charging Scheme 2010 will take into account the
> requirements of policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet
> Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC", and the
> discussions that took place at the RIPE NCC General Meeting
> in May 2009 regarding the 2010 Charging Scheme.
>
> The main features of the Draft Charging Scheme 2010 will be:
>
> - As in previous years, there will be five membership
> categories - Extra Small, Small, Medium, Large and Extra Large
> - The 2010 fee for each membership category will be the same
> as for 2009
> - An algorithm will determine a score that decides what
> category a member belongs to
> - The score will be based on Provider Aggregatable (PA) IPv4
> and PA IPv6 allocated over time
> - Direct assignments will have a recurring charge per
> assignment and the fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment
>
> The RIPE NCC will publish the Draft Charging Scheme 2010 at
> the beginning of July 2009. The RIPE NCC Executive Board will
> then monitor discussion and input from the RIPE NCC
> membership before publishing a final version of the Draft
> Charging Scheme 2010 by 9 September 2009. The RIPE NCC
> membership will vote on this version at the RIPE NCC General
> Meeting on 7 October 2009.
>
> The RIPE NCC notes that this proposal for the Draft Charging
> Scheme 2010 is subject to change based on advice from the
> RIPE NCC's lawyers on tax and legal issues.
>
> Membership discussion of the Draft Charging Scheme 2010
> proposal can take place at <members-discuss at ripe.net>.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Axel Pawlik
> Managing Director
> RIPE NCC"
>
> Kind Regards
> Sergey Sulava
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: members-discuss-admin at ripe.net
> [mailto:members-discuss-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Hostmaster
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 3:22 PM
> To: Natalya Petrova; members-discuss at ripe.net
> Subject: RE: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
>
> Privyet  Natalya
>
> Where is this document?  I cant see it on RIPE?
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: members-discuss-admin at ripe.net
> [mailto:members-discuss-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Natalya Petrova
> Sent: 18 June 2009 11:29
> To: members-discuss at ripe.net
> Subject: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
>
> RegID: kz.kazaktelecom
>
> Good morning, dear colleagues!
> Thanks for your message.
> I have read on a site the information be relative Charging Scheme
> 2010. There are some questions for me.
> I ask the help in the explanatory.
> Questions:
> 1) " - Direct assignments will have a recurring charge per assignment
> and the
> fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - It mentions only PI? or
> PA? or PI+PA?
> 2) "fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - It every month a
> payment? or every quarter? or for a year?
> 3) "fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - It is payment for what
> quantity of addresses (50EUR= ? IPs)?
> 4) " - Direct assignments will have a recurring charge per assignment
> and the
> fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - Operates for all direct
> assignments? or Only new direct assignments (included after 3 May,
> 2009)?
> I shall be very grateful for explanatories.
> Thanks for the help and understanding.
> Yours faithfully,
> Natalya
>
>
> *Disclaimer:*
> This message (including any attachments) contains
> confidential information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
> protected by law. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this
> message and are
> hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
> message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> *Ограничения:*
> Данное сообщение (включая любые вложения) может содержать
> конфиденциальную информацию и быть предназначенным исключительно
> для личности или организации, которой оно адресовано. Если Вы не
> являетесь надлежащим адресатом, то настоящим Вы уведомлены, что любое
> раскрытие, копирование, распространение или использование содержания
> этого сообщения строго запрещено.
>
>
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses by Mail Control -
> www.adaptplc.com
>
>