[mat-wg] followup question from MAT-WG presentation on
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] followup question from MAT-WG presentation on
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Benno Overeinder
benno at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Oct 28 22:45:12 CET 2020
Hi Raffaele, On 28/10/2020 19:25, Raffaele Zullo wrote: > Other than the paths tested in our work, they also work for example in > mobile networks (obviously not all of them) where it is very hard that > transports other than TCP or UDP work. Good to hear! > The MPTCP approach you pointed is very interesting and I would say the > similar thing for UDP-O is that UDP-O is still UDP (like MPTCP is still > TCP) so it can traverse quite easily except for the cases in which there > is a length consistency check. > > I think mostly depends on the applications using UDP-O. If there will > be some strong use cases for UDP-O (for example DNSSEC) we could > probably see UDP-O deployed. I am certainly interested in how it develops and is used in applications. I will keep an eye on UDP-O standardisation and deployment. Cheers, -- Benno -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] followup question from MAT-WG presentation on
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]