[mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Dec 23 17:18:11 CET 2013
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:15:17PM +0100, Lars-Johan Liman <liman at netnod.se> wrote a message of 31 lines which said: > ... and I would add that I don't want DDoS culprits to be able to > use Atlas as a real-time assessment tool of the effectiveness of > their attacks. I do not see the relationship between this requirment and the discussion about the proposed new policy. If I run a dDoS, I can run the Atlas tests too (there is not process to filter out the bad guys...), I would not rely on other people's measurements.
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]