[mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Dec 17 12:54:15 CET 2013
Hi, On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:23:56PM +0100, Vesna Manojlovic wrote: > Our proposed plan is to make all *new* measurements and technical > information about the *new* probes public from an agreed upon date > in the future. We propose implementing this change in mid-April. I'd support changing the default to "public", but I can't see a compelling reason why you would want to make *everything* public. What if I'm measuring something, where I know some bits of my network are broken but need to figure out the overall damage, that I don't want the competition and media to know (if they figure it out themselves, fine, but not handing it on a silver platter). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 826 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/mat-wg/attachments/20131217/4d4a91e9/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]