You are here: Home > Participate > Join a Discussion > RIPE Mailing Lists > The lir-wg Archives > [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?

[lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?

Previous message: [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?

Next message: [db-wg] RE: [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

adrian.pauling at bt.com adrian.pauling at bt.com
Wed Jan 15 10:51:02 CET 2003

we have 'inet6num' objects separate to 'inetnum' to distinguish IPv6 address
assignments from IPv4.

Is the question should different 'peering-set' 'route' objects etc reflect
different peerings for IPv6 from IPv4 that an assigned AS can have? This
scenario is real as I can easily give a current (enterprise LIR) example.

Regards,

Adrian F Pauling
BT Ignite Solutions

Previous message: [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?

Next message: [db-wg] RE: [lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ lir-wg Archives ]