[lir-wg] 50% increase in RIPE fees ? Since when ?
Kurt Erik Lindqvist kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Thu Nov 28 11:41:09 CET 2002
Could we also get RIPE to give out a SLA I would be all for it...:) - kurtis - On måndag, nov 25, 2002, at 16:31 Europe/Stockholm, Andrius Kasparavicius wrote: > Maybe ripe customers should pay per service, not per membership > status. For every > IP allocation(depends on size, work needed), for every ASn, and oth.? > > Andrius > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:27:14PM -0000, Peter Galbavy wrote: >>> I am equally concerned of the rise in fees (although I have been >>> aware it >>> was coming) which I don't see as bringing me anything more value. >>> However, >>> other than mentioning it on the survey that recently took place, I >>> haven't >>> had the time to get involved in more detail with RIPE. It looks like >>> I >>> will have to in future. >> >> For those of us (I am sure it is not just me) supporting legacy >> networks, is >> there any value in pursueing 'merging' LIRs, or does this process >> have a >> detrimental effect on allocations/assignments already made ? Again, I >> have >> not had the time to keep up with the latest documents re merges and >> acquisitions and RIPE. >> >> This may be a cost saving for those who are paying almost completely >> out of >> our own pockets. >> >> Peter >>
[ lir-wg Archives ]