[lir-wg] 50% increase in RIPE fees ? Since when ?
Andrius Kasparavicius andrius at andrius.org
Mon Nov 25 16:31:46 CET 2002
Maybe ripe customers should pay per service, not per membership status. For every IP allocation(depends on size, work needed), for every ASn, and oth.? Andrius On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:27:14PM -0000, Peter Galbavy wrote: > > I am equally concerned of the rise in fees (although I have been aware it > > was coming) which I don't see as bringing me anything more value. However, > > other than mentioning it on the survey that recently took place, I haven't > > had the time to get involved in more detail with RIPE. It looks like I > > will have to in future. > > For those of us (I am sure it is not just me) supporting legacy networks, is > there any value in pursueing 'merging' LIRs, or does this process have a > detrimental effect on allocations/assignments already made ? Again, I have > not had the time to keep up with the latest documents re merges and > acquisitions and RIPE. > > This may be a cost saving for those who are paying almost completely out of > our own pockets. > > Peter >
[ lir-wg Archives ]