neutrality and nat

Hi,

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:32:38PM +0200, Hans Petter Holen wrote:
> Personaly I feel it is a pity that this has turned into a "please use NAT".

It has NOT.  The RIPE185-bis document is clear on this.

> Therefore, I am proposing to change this policy into:
> 
> - stop asking this question
> - stop promoting NAT
> 
> Any views on this ?

I seriously think that adding a second question "have you considered IPv6"
(if only to raise awareness "IPv6 is here to stay") might be a good thing.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:   45114 (45077)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299