[lir-wg] Discussion Summary: Status field for inet6num object s

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:53:02PM +0100, Guy Davies wrote:
> I would prefer RIR-LIR-ALLOCATED, LIR-SUB-ALLOCATED and
> LIR-USER-ASSIGNED (or similar) if we must keep ALLOCATED and ASSIGNED
> in the descriptions.  I don't think that it is immediately clear from
> the proposals below whether LIR-ALLOCATED is allocated by an LIR or
> to an LIR.

That would be fine with me.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  45809 (45931)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299