[lir-wg] AS Number Policy - continued
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Fri Aug 2 13:44:54 CEST 2002
Not really important, but just to avoid being counted as agreeing :-) >Anyway, I think that everyone have suggested to do both with a OR in >between. ...no objection against the OR, but the result of the OR should not be the _only_ input to a decision process. It would be an efficient mechanism to be used _in support_ of continued AS# holdership, though. >Basically just claiming that "yes I do peer at backwater-IX with >Farm-IP and Countryside Networks and I don't get transit from anywhere" >should not be enouhg. I disagree. >RIPE should be able to verify that this is true. Some nit-picking... RIPE (the community): I don't think so - other than having access to some publicly accessible documentation, e.g. in the Routing Registry. The NCC: maybe, if and when we can agree on the criteria, and the cost for verification vs. the result. >- kurtis - Wilfried.
[ lir-wg Archives ]