Creation of Reverse Delegation Objects

Hi all,

Maybe it makes sense to cover PI assignments as zz.unspecified
registry?

This should not harm checking robot and/or end-user   ;-)

Regards,

        Rimas Janusauskas,
        Vilnius University Hostmaster


On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Dominic Spratley wrote:

> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:00:28 +0200
> From: Dominic Spratley <dominic at ripe.net>
> To: Tanja Heimes <theimes at de.cw.net>
> Cc: lir-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: Creation of Reverse Delegation Objects
>
> Hi Tanja,
>
> There are several reasons why we do not accept requests directly
> from end-users. Most are based on the fact that the Internet
> Registry system is hierarchical. This means that we are funded by
> LIRs to provide services to them, not to end-users.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
>
> Dominic Spratley,
>
> R.S. Assistant Manager,
> RIPE NCC
>
>
>
> At 09:45 AM 4/24/2002 +0200, Tanja Heimes wrote:

> >
> >My question now:
> >
> >Should  Provider Indepent IP space not be 100% Provider Indepent in
> >concern to its administration in the RIPE DB?
> >In my opinion the RIPE Robot should distinguish between PA and PI space
> >and not request an reg-id for customers that own PI
> >space and like to create a reverse delegation record.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Tanja Heimes
> >