IPv6 assignments to DNS root servers in the RIPE region

>> nope.  should nasa return 128.8 just because the server is moved from
>> 128.8.10.90?  i don't think so.  but, if it is moved, they should not
>> put anything else at 128.8.10.90 for a decade or two.
> Which makes you agree with Joao, doesn't it?  The way it was done with
> 128.8 obviously created problems, which would mean that "special networks
> for root name servers" might be a good thing after all...

no, quite the opposite
  o nasa should just not put another host at that HOST address
  o and the kremlin should not announce 128.8/16
  o and all the other obvious things that we operators are paid
    to do and not do.

randy