Multihoming - Resilience or Independence
Poul-Henning Kamp phk at critter.freebsd.dk
Thu Oct 11 00:05:55 CEST 2001
In message <200110102151.GAA26904 at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta wr ites: >> But that doesn't change the fact that people will still want a >> solution now, that neither "go to IPv6" nor "wait for IPv6" will >> satisfy them and that ISP's who are able to meet this demand will >> make more money than ISP's who can't... > >Huh? It's you who asked about IPv6. No, I didn't ask, I pointed out that there were _still_ neither an established technique nor a policy for IPv6 in this area. >Anyway, I think we will use up IPv4 address space before IPv4-style >multihoming kills the backbone. It will happen within 3 years. I think you will see a lot of IPv4 space reclaimed by force will be able to put IPv4 on life-support for a LONG time... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
[ lir-wg Archives ]