Criteria for initial PA Allocation
Tue May 22 22:15:22 CEST 2001
In message <20010522213112.H17832 at Space.Net>, Gert Doering writes: >Hi, > >seems I got carried away :-) > >On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 05:37:40PM +0200, Hans Petter Holen wrote: >> | Much more important than working out the details of what criteria qualify >> | you for a /22 would be what criteria will cause RIPE to revoke the /22 it >> | has assigned. >> >> The proposal was that in order to qualify for a "standard /20 PA block" >> you would need to >> >> >- Demonstrated efficient utilisation of a /xx (/22?) >> >Or >> >- Immediate need for a /xx (/22?) >> > >> >- Agree to renumber (Required? Recommended?) >> >> So the proposal is that in order to get a /20 you need to provide >> documentation that you need some percentage of that adress space (25%). > >This is similar to the ARIN policy. > >I think it makes sense - if you are not able to fill a /22, your network >is "smallish". So using PA space and renumbering when changing ISPs is >not *that* hard, if done properly (DHCP, DNS, no hard-coded IP addresses >anywhere). I know several companies who would be willing to renumber once per year as long as they can be multihomed... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
[ lir-wg Archive ]