AW: Initial PA Allocation Criteria

Hans Petter and all,

I am not quite determined about the alternative.
Yes, I think the initial requirement needs to be
less then the /22, admitting that the situation
will then not change dramatically, because a /24
is easy to prove.

Concerning Dave's proposal:
>Perhaps a clause to permit allocations to organisations that provide or can
>prove intent to provide commercial services to third parties should be
added.

Who else is applying for a LIR? Couldn't everybody claim
that?

What about the already raised proposal to set-up a usage
criteria and to (maybe bi-annually) revise allocations?
Could that be handled from the NCC?
And are we gonna have a further increase of LIR applications
over the years to come? Is it worth it?

More questions then answers.
Regards
Karsten

> Von:	Hans Petter Holen [SMTP:hph at online.no]
> Gesendet am:	Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2001 13:52
> An:	Koepp, Karsten; lir-wg at ripe.net
> Betreff:	Re: Initial PA Allocation Criteria
> 
> | after having read several opinions in this thread,
> | I still don't agree to some points. I do think,
> | the policy as proposed would represent a drawback
> | for start-ups entering the market.
> 
> But how do you propose to deal with that ?
> Lower the initial requirement to some lower percentage ?
> 
> -hph
>