Can anyone shed some light on this?
Larisa A. Yurkina
Wed Dec 5 11:56:59 CET 2001
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Stephen Burley wrote: Hi, it looks like a problem we had some time ago. the answer from Database admin was: RPSL requires that both the maintainer of the IP space (i.e. the inetnum object) and the AS number (i.e. the aut-num object) of a route authorize the route creation. This means that the authentication of both maintainers must be included in the e-mail update. The problem is, inetnum object is maintained with RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT but not with your as-mntner. To solve the problem you should ask RIPE NCC hostmaster to add mnt-routes: AS702-MNT to the allocation object. > Further to this i also get the forwarded message that an atempt was made to > change this object - go figure. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephen Burley" <stephenb at uk.uu.net> > To: <lir-wg at ripe.net> > Cc: <db-wg at ripe.net> > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:30 AM > Subject: Can anyone shed some light on this? > > > > route: 188.8.131.52/16 > > descr: UUNET CH > > origin: AS702 > > mnt-by: AS702-MNT > > password: ********* > > changed: jsc at ch.uu.net 20011204 > > source: RIPE > > > > I send the above object to the DB and get the following error: > > > > New FAILED: [route] 184.108.40.206/16 > > route: 220.127.116.11/16 > > descr: UUNET CH > > origin: AS702 > > mnt-by: AS702-MNT > > changed: stephenb at uk.uu.net 20011204 > > source: RIPE > > ***Error: Hierarchical authorisation failed, request forwarded to > > maintainer. > > > > Objects in RIPE-181 format are no longer accepted. > > Please see http://www.ripe.net/rpsl for more information. > > > > RIPE Database Maintenance Department > > > > Which is strange as the mainainer is us AS702-mnt. Any help on this matter > > whould be appreciated as this is not the only one. > > > > Regards > > Stephen Burley > > UUNET EMEA Hostmaster > > SB855-RIPE > > > > > > > With respect, Larisa Yurkina --- RIPN Registry center -----
[ lir-wg Archive ]