Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations

On Jan 25,  8:20, Sean Doran wrote:
> Subject: Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
>
...
> > Note that we make /19 allocations even though one particular ISP is
> > telling the world that /18 is the minimum you ought to have these days.
>
> Yup.  And when you make the /19 allocations, you should
> tell them that in 195/8, if they are announcing a /19, a
> /20, a /21, a /22, a /23 or a /24, that will not work if
> they want to talk to SprintLink via a non-customer path.
>

It's the other way round: SPRINT should tell his customers he can't
guarantee 100% global Internet connectivity because he disagrees with
the current address allocation policy of the IANA/InterNIC/RIPE NCC/AP-NIC.
They might want to look for a different transit provider...

Regards,

Miguel

__________________              __                    ______________________
                               /_/
Miguel A. Sanz          __            __       Email: miguel.sanz at rediris.es
RedIRIS/CSIC           /_/  RedIRIS  /_/              Tel:    + 34 1 5855152
Serrano 142                   __                      Fax:    + 34 1 5855146
E-28006  Madrid              /_/
SPAIN                                                     NETWORK MANAGER
____________ Spanish Academic & Research Network ___________________________