PI vs PA Address Space
Tony Li tli at cisco.com
Thu May 18 02:09:51 CEST 1995
Daniel,
I'm somewhat concerned about the text:
The regional IRs cannot do this because they would face
determining who is a service provider and who is not as well as
enforcing minimum sizes for address allocations. This would
amount to nothing less than the registries regulating Internet
service provision. So far no practical policies for these
determinations have been suggested let alone met with community
consensus.
There is a logical leap here that I'm just not following. Suppose
that some organization requests space from an IR. How does knowing
whether or not they are an ISP matter? I would submit that the IR
must allocate PA (i.e., "leased") address space to the organization
regardless of their business status.
I suspect that the (faulty) thinking here is that folks who ARE an ISP
_automatically_ get PI space. This is NOT the intent of what we've
been doing, at least as far as I know.
As to practical policies, RFC 1518 outlines some obvious cases
(e.g., multihoming) which do deserve PI space. I would hope that this
could be the basis of some well-thought out policies. I should also
point out that no one is going to propose policies other than the
IR's. Have fun writing... ;-)
Tony
[ lir-wg Archives ]