[ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Davids
mdavids at forfun.net
Sat May 27 12:28:24 CEST 2023
Op 27-05-23 om 10:45 schreef Thomas Schäfer: > during the closing plenary were considerations to remove the IPv6-only(with > dns64/nat64) network/ssid the next time. > > I would vote for that. IPv6-mostly covers the traditional IPv6-only. Yes, I agree. > Someone made the proposal to provide a real "ipv6 only" > Let's try it! A lot will break for sure. It's not just websites. The DNS may break as well. I have test domain that can *only* be resolved via IPv6 and it yielded in some interesting findings. If you would like to try: https://42.dnslabs.nl > - VPN, own organisation/company At our company we spent quite some effort is getting this right. And it is fun to open the VPN on an IPv6-only network and still get IPv4-access via the VPN. I guess what I'm trying to say is: it can be done! (but not many companies will have done it) -- Marco
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]