[ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 07:00:48PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote on 03/06/2023 13:33:
> > So how do we get there?
> 
> We got where we are now because there are compelling reasons to deploy 
> ipv4, but not compelling reasons to deploy ipv6.  

On "the wild Internet", I agree with you - we're not at the point yet
where you can do fully without IPv4 (even if CGN'ed).

Going back to the Subject: of this thread, inside sufficiently large
Enterprise networks, the hidden costs of IPv4 (multiple layers of inside 
NAT44, lack of proper network visibility, much more complex debugging)
are sufficiently high that at least *some* networks already felt 
compelled to go IPv6-only, in their internal networks.

(Dual-stack is not very interesting on the inside)

So - how do we send out this message, so it can be heard and understood?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20230604/d6e35628/attachment.sig>