[ipv6-wg] RIPE-554-bis

Hi,

I have been following the presentation in May and the messages in this
list, and since 2018 I have asked  *Jan *if you were planning to update
this document.
So I am very delighted to see that it is happening.

By reviewing the new version I would suggest, in the case of the RFCs that
are in the category of Standards Track, to have the indication of Standard,
for example when updating the IPv6 Basic specification
it would be better to write it in the following way:
IPv6 Basic specification [RFC8200 or STD 86]

and better to also have the reference to the RFC made obsolete by standard
tracks  for example, in this case:
IPv6 Basic specification [RFC8200 or STD 86] (made obsolete RFC 2460), the
main reason is that in almost all the datasheets, the original or previous
RFC are still mentioned.

Finally, I found a writing error in the mandatory support for CPE
equipment, it says RFC7094, and it should be RFC*7084.*

BEST,
Azael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20210830/0f7dc2d6/attachment.html>