[ipv6-wg] ip address pricing and protocol selection
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] ip address pricing and protocol selection
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chriztoffer Hansen
ch at ntrv.dk
Sat Oct 31 03:11:03 CET 2020
On 29 Oct 2020 15:40, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: > I have a question for those of you that offer some kind of hosting. > Do you charge your customers extra for IPv4 or IPv6 addresses? And if > you have changed your policy on that recently, did that change your > customers behaviour regarding their choice on ordering and publishing > IPv4 / IPv6 addresses for the hosted services? > > Reason for asking: At our own hosting services we started out offering > dual stack by default some 6 years ago, moved to ipv6-only by default > about 2 years ago and since about one year we are charging extra for > IPv4 addresses. This has led to a change in behaviour in our customer > base, and I want to see if others are seeing similar changes or a > different situation. For my part. When I first discovered Vultr [0] had a low-tier cloud-compute VM option (public v6 + NAT44) it certainly changed my behavior as a pro-sumer. I would prefer if more hosting providers moved down this path by default. ↪ IPv6 /56-/64 prefix by default. ↪ IPv4 address for $0.5 - $1 per address per VM. [0]: https://www.vultr.com/products/cloud-compute/ -- Best regards, Chriztoffer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Image1604109980.png Type: image/png Size: 153787 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20201031/9aeaa3dd/attachment-0001.png>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] ip address pricing and protocol selection
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]