[ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
twall
tim.wall07 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 30 09:48:48 CET 2020
please can you remove me from this mailing list, thanks On 29/10/2020 07:42, Fernando Gont wrote: > Hi, Jens, > > On 28/10/20 18:32, Jens Link wrote: > [...] >>> - Are specific sections outdated, or are there significant new >>> sections to add? >> >> The SEND requirment? No OS I'm aware of does support it and it only >> makes sense when the networking hardware and the OS support it. > > I think SEND is a smart spec/artifact... but I also think that I would > probably have a hard time finding a reason to deploy it. :-) > > And in the light that in year 2020 apparently folks still don't get to > parse ND options properly, that's yet one more reason to stay away > from complexity. > > Thanks! > > Regards,
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]