[ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fernando Gont
fgont at si6networks.com
Thu Oct 29 08:42:14 CET 2020
Hi, Jens, On 28/10/20 18:32, Jens Link wrote: [...] > >> - Are specific sections outdated, or are there significant new >> sections to add? > > The SEND requirment? No OS I'm aware of does support it and it only > makes sense when the networking hardware and the OS support it. I think SEND is a smart spec/artifact... but I also think that I would probably have a hard time finding a reason to deploy it. :-) And in the light that in year 2020 apparently folks still don't get to parse ND options properly, that's yet one more reason to stay away from complexity. Thanks! Regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE554-bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]