[ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Fri May 29 15:24:40 CEST 2020
On Fri, 29 May 2020, Philip Homburg wrote: >> That also means actively using, promoting and preferring IPv6 only >> services. > > (I'm assuming that IPv6 only meens a service that is reachable only over IPv6 > and not IPv4) > > I don't see why promoting communication failures is a good thing. Except > possibly as a fun thing to nudge people to take action. For example a > quiz with prizes could be hosted on an IPv6-only platform. > >> And not accepting hardware, software or platforms which >> lack features in IPv6 only environments. > > I don't know where to put it, but there may be a benefit for a list that > lists known internet services that do not (or poorly) support IPv6 and with > replacements that do support them. > > Such a list may have two advantages: > 1) Somebody who likes to promote IPv6 would not have to spend time looking > for good alternatives to known brands > 2) Being on a list of backward companies is bad pr for any company, so it > may stimulate companies to get off the wrong part of the list. ipv6shamelist.org seems to be available :-) Cheers, Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]