[ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nico Schottelius
nico.schottelius at ungleich.ch
Fri May 29 14:12:31 CEST 2020
Hey Philip, Philip Homburg <pch-ripeml at u-1.phicoh.com> writes: >>That also means actively using, promoting and preferring IPv6 only >>services. > > (I'm assuming that IPv6 only meens a service that is reachable only over IPv6 > and not IPv4) That's correct. > I don't see why promoting communication failures is a good thing. As previously stated, I think that everyone [in our community] is able to get IPv6. So this is not about promoting communication failures, but switching over to a protocol from which we all benefit. > Except > possibly as a fun thing to nudge people to take action. For example a > quiz with prizes could be hosted on an IPv6-only platform. > >>And not accepting hardware, software or platforms which >>lack features in IPv6 only environments. > > I don't know where to put it, but there may be a benefit for a list that > lists known internet services that do not (or poorly) support IPv6 and with > replacements that do support them. You have a point and it has actually been started about a year ago: https://redmine.ungleich.ch/projects/ipv6/wiki/IPv6_Hardware_Compatibility_List Cheers, Nico -- Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit www.datacenterlight.ch
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Join us for the RIPE NCC Educa::IPv6-only
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]