[ipv6-wg] Fwd: [v6ops] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum

Good morning everyone,

in this light I am wondering two things:

- Why did the essential netboot related information (filename / server)
  never made it into the router advertisements? (I know they exist in
  dhcpv6)
- Would this be the right platform to discuss an extension to router
  advertisements to include a "boot-url" instead of the legacy server +
  filename format?

The latter is already supported by iPXE for years and as far as I can
see, many boot roms are based on iPXE already.

Best regards,

Nico

Fernando Gont <fgont at si6networks.com> writes:

> Hello, folks,
>
> v6ops is WGLC'ing one of the documents
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-01) we
> have authored to improve the reaction of SLAAC to renumbering
> events. This document contains recommendations for Customer Edge
> Routers.
>
> For background, you may want to consult:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-01
>
> If you have any comments/feedback, please do let us know. If possible,
> on the v6ops list (https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Fernando
>
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	[v6ops] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum
> Date: 	Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:47:14 +0000
> From: 	Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net at dmarc.ietf.org>
> To: 	v6ops at ietf.org <v6ops at ietf.org>
>
>
>
> Folks,
>
> This message initiates a WG Last Call on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum.
>
> Please submit comments by April 13, 2020.
>
>   Fred and Ron
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
>
> --
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando at gont.com.ar || fgont at si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1


--
Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit www.datacenterlight.ch