[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Homburg
pch-ripeml at u-1.phicoh.com
Fri Oct 11 09:30:55 CEST 2019
In your letter dated Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:56:12 +0200 you wrote: >* Gert Doering (gert at space.net) [191009 19:57]: >> Troopers runs their main conference wifi with NAT64. If I'm not >> mistaken, so does FOSDEM. > >True. >FOSDEM was Dualstack till 2013 and then switched to IPv6-only in 2014. FOSDEM is similar to the RIPE meeting in that they have both a dual stack SSID and a NAT64 SSID. The difference is that FOSDEM promotes the NAT64 SSID as the main one and the dual stack SSID as the fallback.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]