[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jens Link
lists at quux.de
Wed Oct 9 19:03:28 CEST 2019
Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> writes: > I would expect such devices mostly in a home network (gaming consoles > etc). On a business meeting network like RIPE the number of IPv4-only > devices is negligible. I guess there will be quite a few devices were people disable IPv6. >> We cannot use DNS64 if we expect IPv4 literals or local DNSSEC validation. > > I am sure the few of us who run local DNSSEC validation would love the > opportunity to make it work. Finding IPv4 literals and fixing them is a > feature :) And finding hosts in DNSSEC signed zones not supporting IPv6. I know at least one. Jens -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Delbrueckstr. 41 | 12051 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at quux.de | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]