[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
ayourtch at gmail.com
Tue Oct 8 15:09:10 CEST 2019
No you didn’t, that’s too easy ;-) Any random cafe in Brussels will do ;-) --a > On 8 Oct 2019, at 13:21, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) via ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > At Brussels Midi station... > > Did I win anything ? > <image001.png> > On 07/10/2019, 18:04, "ipv6-wg on behalf of Dave Taht" <ipv6-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote: > > If I can get *one* person in this working group to go down to their > local coffee shop and make ipv6 work by whatever means necessary (and > also fix their bufferbloat) - I'll consider my participation in this > thread a success. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20191008/a0fbf376/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image1.png Type: image/png Size: 214488 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20191008/a0fbf376/attachment.png>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]