[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Mon Oct 7 12:44:48 CEST 2019
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: > Also for many years, we don't actually do it. And whoever it is that > decides not to do it, is certainly part of the RIPE community. The only > reason I can see is that at least that part of the RIPE community does > not consider IPv6-only + NAT64 to be "production ready". On Android/iOS I'd say it's production ready. On classic desktop OSes like MacOS, Windows and Linux it's not. The difference is the presence of widely available 464XLAT support. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]