[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jens Link
lists at quux.de
Sun Oct 6 18:32:18 CEST 2019
"S.P.Zeidler" <spz at serpens.de> writes: > Given we'll have enterprise walled gardens with v4 inside for a long time, > that indeed will take decades. If you plan projects that span more than > one decade, making sure it's IPv6 capable will at least save you money > in the long run, because enterprise-only features come at a premium. A couple of years ago I did an IPv6 workshop for a not so small SAP outsourcing company- I told them "what ever you do make sure your that everything you buy is IPv6 capable." About a year later I was told that they can't implement v6 because they just bought a internal cloud thing that did not support IPv6. Jens -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Delbrueckstr. 41 | 12051 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at quux.de | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]