[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sat Oct 5 23:29:48 CEST 2019
Hi, On Sat, 5 Oct 2019, Michel Py wrote: >> Carlos Friaças wrote : >> Admitting that "zealotism" is not a got thing might be a good 1st step. > > I did not create the IPv4 zealots, I joined their ranks by economic necessity. > I do not like it, but I need the IPv4 ecosystem for 20 more years and I am not going to let the IPv6 zealots destroy my business. Can you let everyone know which ASN or ASNs do you run...? :-) >>> 3 months ago, I turned DECNET off on my network. It was actually not even an IT/network decision; customer >>> decided they were done with a product, and we de-commissioned the tools with DECNET. Business decision. >>> We run OS/2 Warp, MS-DOS, Windows 95, HPUX, Solaris, Windows 2000, and I probably forget some. > >> So, hardly any IPv6 there :-) > > 100% IPv4 :-) OK, so you meant *old* Solaris :-))) >> If a new project pops up that will need 10x the public address space you have... good luck. > > I already have several times more public space than I need. And, $20/IP is nothing in the cost of a new project. Sure. And you are sitting in the 2nd largest economy in the world? (or the 1st? i lost track...). And what about everyone else, sitting in different continents, in developing regions, where $20/IP is really a show-stopper...? The Internet is supposed to be global, right? Carlos > Michel. > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]