[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sat Oct 5 22:49:30 CEST 2019
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019, Jen Linkova wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:04 AM Enno Rey <erey at ernw.de> wrote: >> I support the proposal. >> Once a protocol has reached mainstream deployment (as IPv6 has) a dedicated WG might no longer be needed. I mean, there's no IPv4 WG either, right? > > Actually it's exactly what I said after I became a co-chair. Our > ultimate goal should be to get rid of this group. Let' get IPv6 > deployed and go home. Or to the new adventure. As you've said, we do > not have IPv4 WG. > Unfortunately we are not there yet. Hi, "We" as in "everyone" -- 110% agree. And i must add: there is still a longgggg road ahead. Should the WG try to define new goals, or work more around some measurements in order to support goal evaluation...? Carlos > -- > SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]