[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Sat Oct 5 21:57:40 CEST 2019
... I guess this "war" is why some people want to make ipv6 as much like ipv4 as possible? Only . vs : and hex vs pure number as the only difference? ------- Roger Jørgensen rogerj at gmail.com On Sat, Oct 5, 2019, 21:44 Michel Py <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> wrote: > Hi Job, > > > Job Snijders wrote : > > If the IPv4 vs IPv6 tussle is interpreted as a culture war, > > It is war, but I don't think it is a matter of culture. After all, 20 > years ago we almost all were in the same boat, more or less. Most of us > believed that IPv6 could replace IPv4 in a reasonable number of years, and > all of us were wrong, because it did not. > > It have become a war because of money, and the outcome will be decided by > money, not by ideals. There are people who have admitted that, and people > who have not and keep waging the war as they could still win it. > > Time to be nice has come, and gone. The IPv6 camp has clearly stated that > their goal is to win the war. Battle time. > > Michel. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20191005/196c84d7/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]