[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anton Rieger
inrin at jikken.de
Sat Oct 5 21:24:13 CEST 2019
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 08:10:19PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: >Uh, no. The IETF decides what it is, and if they say it's private >(like they did with RFC1918), then it is. > >If they say it's "reserved", it's not up for grabs (neither for the RIRs >not for any private deployment either). > >"Not RIR space" does not make it "private", there are at least 3 different >states. Best examples are 1.1.1.1 and 5.5.5.5 Anton
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]