[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jens Link
lists at quux.de
Sat Oct 5 18:52:25 CEST 2019
Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan at go6.si> writes: Jan, > I would like to encourage you to submit a proposal to RIPE PC for a BoF > that would discuss your topic. This is a great idea. I will do so right after finishing this mail > If you get enough like-minded people to the BoF and present the > usefulness of more focused IPv4-enhancement work to the community at > closing plenary - then you might get a Task Force or even a Working > Group with a goal of discussing and extending IPv4 - well, who knows, > right? :) As the feedback on (and off) this list has show there are several people agreeing with my arguments that further work on IPv6 is a waste of time and we need to prolong the live of IPv4 until we find a real successor. Maybe should also discuss if this successor should be defined by IETF or by a real standard body like the ITU. Jens -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Delbrueckstr. 41 | 12051 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at quux.de | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]