[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aled Morris
aled.w.morris at googlemail.com
Sat Oct 5 17:50:02 CEST 2019
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 11:34, Jens Link <lists at quux.de> wrote: > > The new successor to IPv4 should not make the same mistakes as IPv6. > [...] > - It MUST only have numbers and dots "." > Maybe we should allow IPv6 addresses to be written in dotted quad format with the quads not being limited to 0..255 but instead 0..4294967295 So instead of writing 2001:4860:4860::8888 we would write 536954976.1214251008.0.34952 which is clearly easier to use. bonus: your old regex ^[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.[0-9]*$ will still work Aled -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20191005/c69ab63a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]