[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jen Linkova
furry13 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 5 03:26:29 CEST 2019
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:45 PM Blake <ipv6 at 2112.net> wrote: > As the OP's goal seems to be XKCD standards compliance(1), perhaps it's time to revive IPv10? Well, if it's what you want to do - this list is the wrong place. https://www.ietf.org/about/participate/get-started/ is what you probably need.. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-11 > > After all, it took Edison two decades to admit DC power distribution couldn't > work, & NYC only had to wait a century more until they could decommission their > commercial DC electrical power distribution network... > ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_currents ) I find this example irrelevant as I've seen IPv6-only networks. Oh wait, I've deployed them... -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]