[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Enno Rey
erey at ernw.de
Fri Oct 4 06:41:22 CEST 2019
Michel, On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:23:55AM +0000, Michel Py wrote: > > Wolfgang Zenker wrote : > > ... the results of the RIPE NCC survey published today lists the scarcity of IPv4 > > addresses as one of the largest challenges facing the participants in the survey. > > The participants in the RIPE NCC survey are not representative of the market. > Here in the USA we have ... an IPv6 deployment rate of > 50%, see https://twitter.com/Enno_Insinuator/status/1179974955502428161. > We are in the end of 2019, I live and work in California, and my ISP does not offer IPv6. That is, in all seriousness, regrettable. I live and work in California, too, not far away from Sacramento. My ISP brings IPv6 to my home, I have it on my phones and I hear that the companies of people I meet over lunch serve terabytes of data over IPv6 every single day. It seems California is a quite diverse place, in many regards... > Your ideas are technically flawed, that being said. And you are not taking it to the right place. > Try the IETF. that was funny. I mean both sentences are heavily flawed but at least the second gave me a good laugh. cheers Enno
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]